Why Your Best Engineers Are Leaving: What Real Leaders Should Do About It

Did You Know?

A recent piece by CodeGood laid bare what many executives refuse to see: the best engineers aren’t leaving because of pay, perks, or ping-pong tables. They’re leaving because their judgment doesn’t matter.

The article detailed story after story where engineers predicted system failures months in advance, only to be ignored by leaders shielded by layers of filtered information. Middle managers, incentivized to “handle it at their level,” sanitized reality before it reached the top. By the time executives became aware of performance issues or morale concerns, the damage was already irreversible.

What’s worse, organizations rationalized the departures as “competitive compensation,” approving 15% raises that didn’t move the needle. The truth? People don’t quit companies for money; they quit for agency, meaning, and respect. As Dan Pink’s "Drive" argued years ago, real engagement stems from autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Those three drivers have been quietly suffocating under outdated leadership models, which were designed for predictability rather than adaptability. Yes, pay people enough so that they aren't thinking about the money; however, it's the culture that keeps them coming back.

Leaders who rely solely on dashboards, filtered reports, and “healthy culture” surveys are managing through illusion. Bureaucracies don’t collapse because of bad intentions; they collapse under the weight of good people disengaged by systems that deny them voice, choice, and trust.

So What?

What CodeGood called “information latency” is more than a communication failure; it’s a leadership systems failure.

Lack of urgency is a silent killer of transformation. When information flows upward too slowly or is too filtered, urgency can’t form because the people who could act don’t know what’s broken until it’s too late.

Jeff Hiatt’s ADKAR model reveals a similar breakdown: organizations often skip the Awareness and Desire stages of change. Engineers know what’s wrong, but leaders remain unaware; or worse, aware but indifferent. Without desire at the top to address real pain points, Knowledge and Ability become irrelevant.

If you pay attention to work and flow, delay costs kill economics. Every week leaders spend in denial compounds technical debt, morale debt, and opportunity cost. “Handle it at your level” might sound efficient, but it’s a slow-motion disaster when those handling it lack the authority to fix it.

This is not a technology problem; it’s an architecture of leadership problem.

Leaders have been operating under the same command-and-control system for fifty years. We’ve innovated every process except leadership itself. That’s the blind spot. The model assumes control equals stability, when in fact it breeds fragility in complex adaptive work.

Today’s workforce, especially engineers, can instantly see this gap. They live in systems of continuous integration, rapid feedback, and decentralized decision-making. Yet they report into leadership models that treat escalation as failure and feedback as friction. 

The mismatch is glaring.

Now What?

Executives must treat information flow as an economic asset and leadership innovation as a competitive advantage. Retention and engagement can’t be “HR’s job.” They are architectural design problems that demand the same rigor we bring to systems engineering. You want a Michelin-starred resturant, you have to hire Michelin-starred chefs AND provide a Michelin-starred kitchen (and equipment). 

Here’s what forward-thinking leaders can do:

1. Install Skip-Level Feedback Loops.
   Regular direct conversations with people three or four layers below you aren’t “micromanagement.” They’re ground truth. As CodeGood’s data showed, a CTO who spent four hours a week in skip-level conversations reduced attrition by 60%. It also desenatizes people to talk to you given the invisible power-distance problem of your position alone.

2. Build Trust Before Crisis.
   Engineers will tell you everything if they believe you’ll act. Fix one problem fast and visibly, it signals that honesty leads to change, not retaliation.

3. Measure Signal, Not Sentiment.
   AI and data mining can detect disengagement months before HR can. Patterns in collaboration tools, pull requests, or documentation activity often precede attrition by weeks. It’s not surveillance, it’s empathy at scale. Use the data to start conversations, not write performance plans.

4. Redesign Decision Flow.
   Shorten your “lead time for learning.” Empower the people closest to the work to make decisions with high economic leverage. Decentralization isn’t chaos; it’s how complexity gets managed in adaptive systems.

5. Reframe Leadership as an Enabling System.
   Modern leadership isn’t about commanding, it’s about clearing the path for autonomy, mastery, and purpose to thrive. Your job is not to be the smartest in the room; it’s to make sure smart people don’t need your permission to do the right thing.

Leadership has not seen meaningful innovation in decades. But it’s time. Organizations that cling to managerial control will continue to lose the very people capable of saving them. Those who redesign leadership as a network, not a hierarchy, will not only retain talent, they’ll attract the kind of creative, high-agency professionals who refuse to work anywhere else.

Catalyst Leadership Questions

Let's Do This!

The most expensive form of learning is through resignation letters.

Leadership, as it stands, is outdated software, built for control, not curiosity. The next generation of leaders must reboot around autonomy, mastery, and purpose, the motivational triad that drives human engagement. Until leadership evolves beyond performance reviews and retention bonuses, companies will continue to lose their best people one predictable exit interview at a time.

Or, as one of my favorite engineers once said:

“You can’t empower people while ignoring their judgment.”